Skip to content
  • Home
  • Services
    • Legal Compliance and Risk Mitigation
    • Representation – Litigation Defense
    • Safety & Health (including COVID-19) Services
    • Remote Work Solutions
    • Technology and the Workplace
    • EEO/Harassment and Discrimination Prevention
    • Pre-Hire, Background Checks and Hiring
    • Wage & Hour
    • Employee Relations
    • Managing Leaves of Absence
    • Employee Benefits
    • Contracts and Agreements
    • Labor Relations/CBA/Union/NLRA
    • Workplace Investigations
    • Training
  • Team
    • Sima Ali, Esq.
    • Karen Lynch, Esq.
    • Kerri Beatty, Esq.
    • Andrea Moss, Esq.
    • Mary McCarthy
  • Blog
  • Newsletters
  • Connect
  • Home
  • Services
    • Legal Compliance and Risk Mitigation
    • Representation – Litigation Defense
    • Safety & Health (including COVID-19) Services
    • Remote Work Solutions
    • Technology and the Workplace
    • EEO/Harassment and Discrimination Prevention
    • Pre-Hire, Background Checks and Hiring
    • Wage & Hour
    • Employee Relations
    • Managing Leaves of Absence
    • Employee Benefits
    • Contracts and Agreements
    • Labor Relations/CBA/Union/NLRA
    • Workplace Investigations
    • Training
  • Team
    • Sima Ali, Esq.
    • Karen Lynch, Esq.
    • Kerri Beatty, Esq.
    • Andrea Moss, Esq.
    • Mary McCarthy
  • Blog
  • Newsletters
  • Connect

When Corporate Security Policies Conflict with Labor Laws

  • By Kerri Beatty
hrtelligence

Powered by HRtelligence.com

Submitted by Ali Law Group PC on August 9, 2016

Bridgewater Associates is under scrutiny for what has been described as a culture of surveillance and intimidation. Bridgewater manages billions of dollars and is the world’s largest hedge fund. A Bridgewater employee for five years, Christopher Tarui filed a complaint in January alleging that he was subjected to repeated sexual harassment by his supervisor during business trips over the course of a year. Tarui said he was reluctant to report the harassment for fear that it would not be kept confidential due to Bridgewater’s radical policy of widespread internal airing of employee grievances. After he reported the harassment, several of the firm’s managers allegedly pressured him to rescind his claims. According to Mr. Tarui, he was suspended in retaliation for threatening to file a charge with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

In a related filing, the NLRB claims that Bridgewater’s policies coerce and restrict employee communication in violation of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). While Bridgewater insists that its employment agreements protect the firm’s confidentiality interests and legitimate business concerns, the NLRB says the company’s confidentiality provisions restrain and interfere with employees’ rights.

Both Mr. Tarui’s harassment complaint and the NLRB’s filings demonstrate that companies should exercise caution not to illegally overexert control through information security policies. Read more in the New York Times article.

  • email
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • twitter
  • google+
  • pinterest
PrevPreviousCourt Bans the Use of Forced Arbitration Clauses in Employment Contracts
NextOrlando Judge Rules in Favor of Disney in H-1B Racketeering SuitsNext

11 Prospect Street, Suite 1A, Huntington, NY 11743
(631) 423-3440

Linkedin

©2025 Ali Law Group. All Rights Reserved.
This material is for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice.