Skip to content
  • Home
  • Services
    • Legal Compliance and Risk Mitigation
    • Representation – Litigation Defense
    • Safety & Health (including COVID-19) Services
    • Remote Work Solutions
    • Technology and the Workplace
    • EEO/Harassment and Discrimination Prevention
    • Pre-Hire, Background Checks and Hiring
    • Wage & Hour
    • Employee Relations
    • Managing Leaves of Absence
    • Employee Benefits
    • Contracts and Agreements
    • Labor Relations/CBA/Union/NLRA
    • Workplace Investigations
    • Training
  • Team
    • Sima Ali, Esq.
    • Karen Lynch, Esq.
    • Kerri Beatty, Esq.
    • Andrea Moss, Esq.
    • Mary McCarthy
  • Blog
  • Newsletters
  • Connect
  • Home
  • Services
    • Legal Compliance and Risk Mitigation
    • Representation – Litigation Defense
    • Safety & Health (including COVID-19) Services
    • Remote Work Solutions
    • Technology and the Workplace
    • EEO/Harassment and Discrimination Prevention
    • Pre-Hire, Background Checks and Hiring
    • Wage & Hour
    • Employee Relations
    • Managing Leaves of Absence
    • Employee Benefits
    • Contracts and Agreements
    • Labor Relations/CBA/Union/NLRA
    • Workplace Investigations
    • Training
  • Team
    • Sima Ali, Esq.
    • Karen Lynch, Esq.
    • Kerri Beatty, Esq.
    • Andrea Moss, Esq.
    • Mary McCarthy
  • Blog
  • Newsletters
  • Connect

U.S. Supreme Court Holds Title VII Protects LGBTQ Employees

  • By Kerri Beatty
hrtelligence

Powered by HRtelligence.com

Submitted by Ali Law Group PC on June 18, 2020

The United States Supreme Court issued a landmark decision on June 15, 2020, in the case of Bostock v. Clayton County, ruling that the prohibitions against discrimination “because of sex” contained in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) extend to protect gay and transgender employees against workplace discrimination.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 expressly prohibits employment discrimination on five specified grounds: “race, color, religion, sex, [and] national origin.” However, neither “sexual orientation” nor “gender identity” appears on that list. The question before the Supreme Court was whether “sexual orientation” or “gender identity” are protected categories that should be afforded protection under Title VII.

In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that Title VII does protect LGBTQ employees. Because discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity requires an employer to intentionally treat individual employees differently because of their sex, an employer who intentionally penalizes an employee because of sexual orientation or gender identity also violates Title VII. Therefore, employers are prohibited from adversely affecting the employment of their employees because of their sexual orientation or gender identity, as they necessarily entail discrimination based on sex.

Both the New York State Human Rights Law and the New York City Human Rights Law include sexual orientation in their prohibited bases for discrimination and therefore many New York employers may already have workplace policies prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Employers should carefully evaluate their employment policies and procedures to ensure that sexual orientation and gender identity are categories upon which discrimination and harassment are prohibited in the workplace.

  • email
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • twitter
  • google+
  • pinterest
PrevPreviousDOL Amends Regulation on “Fluctuating Workweek” Method of Pay
NextU.S. Department of Labor Issues New FMLA FormsNext

11 Prospect Street, Suite 1A, Huntington, NY 11743
(631) 423-3440

Linkedin

©2025 Ali Law Group. All Rights Reserved.
This material is for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice.