Skip to content
  • Home
  • Services
    • Legal Compliance and Risk Mitigation
    • Representation – Litigation Defense
    • Safety & Health (including COVID-19) Services
    • Remote Work Solutions
    • Technology and the Workplace
    • EEO/Harassment and Discrimination Prevention
    • Pre-Hire, Background Checks and Hiring
    • Wage & Hour
    • Employee Relations
    • Managing Leaves of Absence
    • Employee Benefits
    • Contracts and Agreements
    • Labor Relations/CBA/Union/NLRA
    • Workplace Investigations
    • Training
  • Team
    • Sima Ali, Esq.
    • Karen Lynch, Esq.
    • Kerri Beatty, Esq.
    • Andrea Moss, Esq.
    • Mary McCarthy
  • Blog
  • Newsletters
  • Connect
  • Home
  • Services
    • Legal Compliance and Risk Mitigation
    • Representation – Litigation Defense
    • Safety & Health (including COVID-19) Services
    • Remote Work Solutions
    • Technology and the Workplace
    • EEO/Harassment and Discrimination Prevention
    • Pre-Hire, Background Checks and Hiring
    • Wage & Hour
    • Employee Relations
    • Managing Leaves of Absence
    • Employee Benefits
    • Contracts and Agreements
    • Labor Relations/CBA/Union/NLRA
    • Workplace Investigations
    • Training
  • Team
    • Sima Ali, Esq.
    • Karen Lynch, Esq.
    • Kerri Beatty, Esq.
    • Andrea Moss, Esq.
    • Mary McCarthy
  • Blog
  • Newsletters
  • Connect

New York Appellate Court Holds that Courier for a Gig Economy Business is an Independent Contractor

  • By Kerri Beatty
hrtelligence

Powered by HRtelligence.com

Submitted by Ali Law Group PC on July 15, 2018

On June 22, 2018, the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, Third Department, found that a courier who performed delivery services was as an independent contractor, and not an employee, for unemployment insurance purposes. Matter of Vega , 2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 04610 (3d Dep’t. 2018).

In Matter of Vega, Postmates, a company which operates a web-based delivery service, appealed the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board (the “Board”), which determined that an employer-employee relationship existed between Postmates and a former employee. The former employee (the “claimant”) applied for unemployment insurance benefits after Postmates terminated its relationship with him. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, reversing a decision by an Administrative Law Judge, deemed Postmates liable for additional unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration paid to claimant and those similarly situated.

On appeal, the Third Department overturned the Board’s decision and held that the relationship between claimant and Postmates lacked the requisite indicia of supervision, direction and control necessary to establish an employer-employee relationship. In making its determination, the court noted that, “The Board’s determination of an employment relationship will be upheld if supported by substantial evidence; however, ‘[i]ncidental control over the results produced — without further evidence of control over the means employed to achieve the results — will not constitute substantial evidence of an employer-employee relationship.’” Id. (citations omitted). The court found that although proof was submitted with respect to Postmates’ incidental control over the couriers, such proof did not constitute substantial evidence of an employer-employee relationship to the extent that it failed to provide sufficient indicia of Postmates’ control over the means by which the couriers perform their work. 

The decision is significant in that it lends further guidance as to classification of employees versus independent contractors, especially in gig economy positions that are web-based and have a high degree of flexibility and autonomy.

  • email
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • twitter
  • google+
  • pinterest
PrevPreviousNew York State Division of Human Rights To Investigate Pregnancy Discrimination Claims Against Several Major Companies
NextCompany E-Mail Policies: Confidential or Not?Next

11 Prospect Street, Suite 1A, Huntington, NY 11743
(631) 423-3440

Linkedin

©2025 Ali Law Group. All Rights Reserved.
This material is for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice.